Abstract (living draft v0.7, 2026-05-18)

Local use of open protein-structure models is attractive for researchers without CUDA cluster access, but hardware-viability claims need target-level evidence rather than anecdotes. We report an 8-target reproducibility benchmark of SimpleFold-3B on a 128 GB M3 Max workstation, using a direct local CLI route and public audit artifacts. Phase 1A froze the target set (13CZ:A, 13EE:A, 13FT:A, 11BC:C, 12OY:A, 9H8N:A, 9K9X:A, 9K9Y:A) before the four prospective targets were executed. All 8 targets produced predictions and scores. Across the frozen set, median wall-clock time was 395.96 seconds, median approximate peak RSS was 34.08 GB, median sequence-aligned lDDT was 0.8597, and median TM-score was 0.9218. The three long-bin targets (565-604 aa) completed without OOM at 34.02-34.64 GB peak RSS. Selective repeat controls now cover the 13CZ:A route/cache anchor plus the reviewer-sensitive 11BC:C hard/coverage target and 9K9Y:A long-bin target. This is not a model leaderboard, not a reproduction of the SimpleFold CASP14 headline benchmark, not an official AlphaFold 3 evaluation, and not a biological generality claim. Under this exact model, hardware, execution route, target set, and scorer, local SimpleFold-3B inference was operationally viable and auditable; the public source snapshot and Zenodo archive are available at https://github.com/Theovia/eigen-reprod-atlas-phase1a/releases/tag/v0.1.2-phase1a and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20275055.

Keywords: protein structure prediction, SimpleFold, Apple Silicon, MLX, reproducibility, benchmark provenance, Cloudflare Workers, single-researcher.


Notes

This abstract intentionally does not claim SimpleFold paper reproduction or multi-model benchmark results. Those claims require a different no-fixture published-metric comparison and the later Phase 1B expansion.